close
Puerto rico government

AOC accuses Lauren Boebert of making fun of sick grandmother in dispute over government benefits

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez accused fellow lawmaker Lauren Boebert of making fun of her ailing grandmother on Twitter on Sunday, following a dispute between women in Congress over government benefit programs.

The row began on Saturday night when Ocasio-Cortez, a progressive Democrat from New York, shared a video of Boebert, a Republican from Colorado, speaking that day at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Dallas.

In the video, Boebert criticizes government benefit programs, saying, “We’re here to tell the government, we don’t want your benefits, we don’t want your well-being. Don’t come knock on my door with it. your ‘Fauci ouchie,’ – you leave us alone. “

In response, Ocasio-Cortez tweeted sarcastically, “Tell them out loud, proud girl! The GOP is going to remove your unemployment protections and dismantle any semblance of a public safety net we have left! Then make the workers pay. much more for everything with low wages while Wall St gets a meal ticket! Good old conservative values ​​baby! “

Tell them loud and proud girl! The GOP will remove your unemployment protections and dismantle any semblance of a public safety net we have left! Then get workers to pay a lot more for everything with low wages while Wall St gets a meal ticket!

Good old custodian values ​​baby! https://t.co/inym5QkuBC

– Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) July 11, 2021

Following this tweet, Boebert hit back at Ocasio-Cortez by stating that “no one removes the safety nets”. The Colorado Republican then sarcastically asked Ocasio-Cortez how “government dependency” worked for his “abuela”, which means grandmother in Spanish.

The comment appeared to refer to an earlier tweet from Ocasio-Cortez this month, in which she shared that her grandmother in Puerto Rico had yet to receive government assistance for her home after the destruction of the house. Hurricane Maria in 2017.

In this tweet, the New York Democrat said her grandmother fell ill and blamed the lack of financial support for hurricane relief on former President Donald Trump. At the time, the tweet prompted a backlash from conservatives, including Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), who accused Ocasio-Cortez of not taking care of her grandmother herself.

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) accused Representative Lauren Boebert of making fun of her ailing grandmother on Sunday following a dispute over government benefit programs. Here, AOC speaks at a rally at Howard University on May 13, 2019 in Washington, DC
Alex Wong / Getty Images

On Sunday, Boebert appeared to be fueling this fire by tweeting to Ocasio-Cortez: “Growing up in a Democratic household, I stood in line for government bread and cheese. I want more for your grandmother, just like I did. did it for me. Don’t limit the American dream. “

Ocasio-Cortez then quickly hit back at Boebert, accusing the Republican lawmaker of “making fun” of his ailing family member.

“Thank you for proving to the world that today’s version of the ‘conservative model’ is someone who laughs at the sick grandparents of other people on the Internet. I can promise you that I will treat your family better than I do. mine. And I will fight for your constituents too, “she wrote.

Thank you for proving to the world that today’s version of the “conservative role model” is about someone making fun of other people’s sick grandparents on the Internet.

I can promise you that I will treat your family better than mine. And I will fight more for your constituents too. https://t.co/Mm9IXQTTnq

– Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) July 11, 2021

Boebert and Ocasio-Cortez have often fought over political issues on Twitter.

Boebert, a staunch Trump supporter currently in her first term, said in 2020 she was “absolutely on the run” to “defend herself from conservative values ​​and take on AOC,” according to the New York Post.

The two lawmakers also argued over the Jan.6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

While Boebert accused Ocasio-Cortez of dramatizing the events of the deadly attack, the New York Democrat said the Republican lawmaker played down the riot. Ocasio-Cortez also suggested that several Republicans contributed to the violence that day by pushing the false narrative that the 2020 election was stolen due to voter fraud.

Boebert was one of many Trump supporters speaking to CPAC on Saturday. In addition to criticizing government benefit programs, the Republican lawmaker accused the Biden administration of operating under “tyrannical rule” through coronavirus lockdowns and vaccination initiatives.



Source link

read more
Legislature

The Florida legislature is waging war on citizens’ petitions.

Howard L. Simon

Howard L. Simon

The legislature got it with the intrusion on their power by the people of Florida.

In the last session, lawmakers passed the Senate Bill 1890, a harsh measure aimed at preventing citizens from collecting petitions in favor of constitutional amendments by limiting financial contributions that are the oxygen of political movements .

The latter restriction places a cap of $ 3,000 on contributions to committees working to submit a constitutional amendment to voters or opposing a proposed amendment, is being challenged in federal court.

Unsurprisingly, on July 1, the day the law was due to come into force, a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction.

For more than 50 years, Floridians have had the right to “propose the revision or amendment” of their constitution by petition of initiative. Essentially, it allows people to go over the heads of lawmakers, straight to voters, when they are frustrated by the inability or unwillingness of the legislature to resolve issues.

And boy, has the legislature felt both the intrusion into its authority and the policies put forward by the people.

Lawmakers fought the people’s proposals and, after they were passed, did what they could to weaken what voters approved when the people took power to:

  • Dedicate funds to a trust to purchase land for conservation purposes
  • Reduce the size of the class.
  • Enact Fair District amendments to prohibit partisan gerrymandering.
  • Authorize the use of marijuana for medical purposes.
  • Demand a gradual increase in the minimum wage.
  • Restore the right to vote for those convicted of felony.

To understand the legislative assembly’s institutional hostility to direct democracy, it helps to see the forest and not just the last tree. Remember some of the weapons that lawmakers have used to hinder and frustrate the people’s right to change their constitution:

  • Ban on collecting petition signatures near polling stations (where registered voters can be found).
  • Require sponsors of constitutional amendments, but not election candidates, to pay to verify signatures.
  • Require Secretary of State’s approval of the text of a proposed amendment and of the voting summary.
  • Require each signature to be on a separate sheet of paper rather than allowing multiple voters to sign on a single sheet
  • Reduced the expiration date of valid signatures from four to two years.
  • Mandate the Supreme Court’s review of the language of a citizen-initiated constitutional amendment, but not amendments proposed by the legislature.
  • Prohibition of paying petition distributors by signature.
  • Allow electronic signatures on candidate petitions, but not citizen-initiated constitutional amendments.

The attorney general (who has the unenviable burden of defending laws enacted by the legislature, whether stupid or unconstitutional) claimed that the latest push to quash citizen-initiated constitutional amendments is just a “cap.” temporary and targeted ”(imposed only in the first at the stage of collecting the petition) and designed to ensure that the proposed amendments have broad support and are not the project of a few donors with deep pockets. (John Morgan’s name is mentioned often here, as if he was the only well-heeled sponsor or opponent of a constitutional amendment in Florida history.)

Note a bit of hypocrisy buried in this attempt to limit contributions that “would limit debate and discussion of a ballot measure,” as the courts have characterized such efforts.

For many conservatives, money is often defended as a form of speech. But as the Supreme Court noted decades ago, “limits on contributions which in turn limit spending clearly infringe freedom of expression.” That is, all speech is protected. It cannot be acceptable for lawmakers to limit speech because it promotes progressive goals.

In granting the preliminary injunction, the federal judge cited two decisions that have governed for the past 40 years, one from the United States Supreme Court. Both argue that a limit on contributions to voting measures “undermines freedom of expression”.

The fact that the legislature has passed the contribution limit anyway is one strategy, employed in this and other areas of law, by which the legislature hopes to induce the courts of appeal (and perhaps the Supreme Court of United States) to drop precedents and change the law.

Equally disturbing was Governor Ron DeSantis’ reaction to the injunction.

He said he was convinced the state would prevail when he got to the court of appeal. In this, it fuels the cynicism that erodes respect for the rule of law, namely that what the law is depends on the policy of the judges hearing the case. His comment suggested that he expected the preliminary injunction but that his real audience is the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which has a majority of judges appointed by Republican presidents, including six appointed by the United States. former President Trump. But it is interesting that the federal judge who prohibited the entry into force of the law.

Hopefully, in the event of an appeal, the injunction will be upheld by the court of appeal. But our rights should not depend on the expectation that the courts will uphold constitutional principles.

Did your state representative and senator vote to restrict your rights by approving SB 1890? Probably: 75 state officials and 23 senators said yes.

Remember this for the next election.

Howard L. Simon was executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida from 1997 until his retirement in 2018 after the constitutional amendment, which he helped draft, restoring the right to vote for those who have served their criminal sentence.

read more
Legislative assembly

Former AIADMK Minister Thoppu ND Venkatachalam joins DMK today

Former AIADMK Minister Thoppu ND Venkatachalam, who was expelled from the party ahead of the assembly elections, said on Saturday he would join the ruling DMK, in the presence of Chief Minister MK Stalin, in Chennai on Sunday .

Mr Venkatachalam, a former MP for Perundurai, told The Hindu here that 300 workers will also join the DMK, along with him. He said it was a difficult decision to leave AIADMK, for which he had worked hard.

He was elected to the Perundurai Assembly in 2011 and 2016 and served as Minister of Environment and Revenue in the Jayalalithaa government. As he was refused the nomination in the last legislative elections, he entered the fray as an independent. Then the AIADMK kicked him out.

ND Venkatachalam is an Indian politician and former minister and former member of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly from Perundurai constituency. He was refused the party ticket in the 2021 general election. He therefore ran as an independent candidate and lost. He was a member of the Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam party and now excluded from the party.

Former AIADMK Minister Thoppu ND Venkatachalam, who was expelled from the party ahead of the assembly elections, said on Saturday he would join the ruling DMK, in the presence of Chief Minister MK Stalin, in Chennai on Sunday .

Mr Venkatachalam, a former MP for Perundurai, told The Hindu here that 300 workers will also join the DMK, along with him. He said it was a difficult decision to leave AIADMK, for which he had worked hard.

He was elected to the Perundurai Assembly in 2011 and 2016 and served as Minister of Environment and Revenue in the Jayalalithaa government. As he was denied the nomination in the last Assembly elections, he entered the fray as an independent. Then the AIADMK kicked him out.

ND Venkatachalam is an Indian politician and former minister and former member of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly from Perundurai constituency. He was a member of the Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam party and now excluded from the party.


Source link

read more
Upper house

Maharashtra: Activists ignite as bldrs named in duck land fraud action | Bombay News

This Ulwe plot belonged to the Khan Bahadur Hormasji Maneckji Bhiwandiwala trust

Navi Mumbai: In 2011, the state government formed a three-member investigative committee to investigate the fraudulent conversion of land owned by Sir Mohammed Yusuf Trust, Mumbai (645 acres), Khan Bahadur Hormasji Maneckji Bhiwandiwala ( KBHMB) Trust, Mumbai (2,000 acres in 18 villages) and Sri Swami Hatiramji Mutt Trust, Tirupati (82 acres). Some of Navi Mumbai’s top builders were named in a report submitted by the committee as it investigated the violations.
Local activists say no action has been taken against the accused so far.
The 12.5% ​​that Cidco returned to the alleged owners was then taken back by the builders, it was claimed. A public interest dispute was filed in the Bombay High Court in 2011 and the issue was also raised in the upper house by some MLCs, including Chandrakant Patil.
The three-member committee included the deputy collectors (land acquisitions) Sameer Kurtkoti, Makrand Deshmukh and Revati Gaikar. The committee delivered a 20-page report to the Raigad collector on December 27, 2013 and called for, among other recommendations, a police investigation.
Then the collector of Raigad had recommended on January 10, 2014 to the divisional commissioner of Konkan an investigation and a filing of criminal offenses against the builder Urmesh Udani, talathi Sanjay Sonawane, the security agent Shri Bhagat of Metro Center 1.
Sonawane and Bhagat voluntarily retired before any investigation and action for their alleged involvement in the irregularities could be taken. Both were not available to comment on the matter.
“The report mentions that the land from Sir Mohammed Yusuf-Mumbai Trust and Khan Bahadur Hormasji Maneckji Bhiwandiwala-Mumbai Trust was purchased by builder Urmesh Udani, who then claimed 12.5% ​​of developed land benefits. Several other builders and politicians have colluded with Cidco officials to seize the land. But the government has never acted against the culprits, ”said Rajeev Mishra, a right to information activist (RTI), who obtained the documents.
“The Raigad collector had recommended to the Konkan divisional commissioner to file a first information report. Instead of filing FIRs, authorities mixed the issue with eight other police FIRs filed for separate offenses and an economic offenses wing investigation. This was a deliberate attempt to distract public attention from the central issue. Last month I requested a police investigation but my complaint is still pending, ”Mishra added.
“Various investigations are underway by the police,” said Shashikant Mahavarkar, head of vigilance, Cidco.
Efforts to contact the Sri Swami Hathiramji Mutt Trust were unsuccessful.
Narendra Jhaveri of Khan Bahadur Hormasji Maneckji Bhiwandiwala trust-Mumbai declined to comment on the matter.
Sir Mohammed Yusuf Trust-Mumbai official Harshada Bhande said: “Due to Covid, no one is available at the moment.”
An attorney for some of the trustees of the Khan Bahadur Hormasji Maneckji Bhiwandiwala trust, also said: “The land trust disputes are pending before the Bombay High Court and the Charities Commissioner for disposal. These are needlessly delayed.

FacebookTwitterLinkedinE-mail


Source link

read more
Legislative assembly

Nana Patole wiretapping: survey panel led by the DGP set up by the government of Maharashtra

The Maharashtra government on Friday set up a three-member committee headed by Police Director General Sanjay Pandey to investigate the suspected telephone tapping President of the State Congress, Nana Patole, during the tenure of the previous government led by the BJP.

The other members of the committee are the state intelligence commissioner and the additional commissioner of the special branch. The report must be submitted to the government within three months.

The terms of the commission’s investigation ARE to find out whether from 2015 to 2019, the phones of public officials were illegally tapped for political purposes and to establish accountability.

Last week in the legislature, the state’s interior minister, Dilip Walse Patil, announced that the government would investigate Patole’s allegations. Patil’s announcement came in response to Patole raising the issue in the Assembly.

“Patole spoke about his bugged phone in 2016-17. He also mentioned that other people’s phones have been placed under surveillance. It is a serious problem. A high-level investigation will be carried out and action will be taken against those responsible, ”Patil said.

In the assembly, Patole had said: “My phone was tapped in 2016-2017 under the name of Amjad Khan… it was alleged that he was involved in drug trafficking.

He added that the phones of the personal assistant of Union Minister Roasaheb Danve, then of BJP deputy Sanjay Kakade and other elected officials had also been tapped. “I was an MP in 2016-2017 and there was no reason to bug my phone. It is an attempt to destroy political careers, ”he added.


Source link

read more
Puerto rico government

Puerto Rico relaxes mask rules: Travel Weekly

For fully immunized travelers, Puerto Rico no longer requires masks to be worn in private and public spaces, indoors and outdoors.

However, local businesses still have the flexibility to set rules and limitations that exceed government requirements.

All businesses, including restaurants, theaters, shopping malls, casinos, supermarkets, pharmacies, gas stations, bars, nightclubs and gambling halls are licensed to operate at full capacity. Outdoor bars and “chinchorros” (kiosks or bars that serve local foods) require a physical distance of six feet between those who are not from the same family unit.

All attractions, activities, and events can be held at full capacity, and only those who are not fully immunized (including children ages 2-11) are required to wear masks. The exceptions are health centers and airports, where masks are mandatory for everyone.

Masks are also always required on all forms of public transport, including ferries to / from Culebra and Vieques.

Visitors arriving at the San Juan airport can receive a Johnson & Johnson vaccine in Terminal B. The same is now offered at the Maritime Transportation Authority ferry terminal in Ceiba.

The visitor’s website lists all of Puerto Rico’s revised steps and guides.


Source link

read more
Legislature

Massachusetts legislature unanimously passes $ 48.1 billion budget

More than a week into the fiscal year, the House and Senate bipartisanly agreed to an annual budget of $ 48.1 billion and sent the proposal to Gov. Charlie Baker’s office.

The two branches voted unanimously to approve the revised spending plan, which calls for the ongoing consecration of the state’s controversial film tax credit program, with the continued postponement of the implementation of a tax deduction for charitable donations; and the $ 350 million set aside to support multi-year education funding reform legislation. .

The chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Representative Aaron Michlewitz, who co-chaired the conference committee that resolved differences between the House and Senate budget proposals, said the vote “will mark the point. culminating in a volatile 16-month odyssey we’ve seen since the pandemic first hit the Commonwealth.

Around the same time last year, budget writers were concerned about a possible implosion of tax revenues and whether state reserves would be sufficient to keep public services together. But taxpayers have provided strong collections to the state, allowing significant increases in spending and allowing for historic deposits in the Rainy Day Fund.

Representative Todd Smola de Warren, one of the two Republicans involved in the budget negotiations, hailed the final deal as “the culmination of this good working relationship that we have across the aisle.”

The 160 representatives and 40 senators all voted to accept the conference committee’s budget.

The budget funds one-sixth of this $ 1.5 billion school funding reform law, approved in 2019, after the pandemic disrupted its original seven-year implementation schedule.

Legislative negotiators struck a compromise on the multiple policy areas that separated House and Senate budget bills, including the future of a program offering tax credits to film and television productions in Massachusetts.

In their compromise, the legislature agreed to make the credit permanent while imposing one of the changes supported by the Senate. Production companies would now be required to make at least 75% of their main photography days or spend at least 75% of their budget in Massachusetts, up from 50% currently.

The final budget does not include Senate-sanctioned language allowing the purchase of Massachusetts lottery products with debit cards, which both this branch and Baker have sought unsuccessfully in previous spending bills.

Negotiators also removed another section from the Senate budget that would have increased the per-trip charge on transportation companies such as Uber and Lyft.

The bill does not propose any general tax increase.

Lawmakers have again chosen to postpone the implementation of a tax deduction designed to increase donations to charities and nonprofits, a move that officials say would free up $ 64 million to spend in the country. spring. The charitable deduction, approved by voters statewide in 2000 but delayed by a series of delays, will now only begin until at least 2023. The budget bill does not explicitly set a new start date and simply says that the program “will not be authorized for the tax year beginning January 1, 2022.

read more
Upper house

After a deal with Netflix, Shonda Rhimes asks for $ 25 million for LA Home

Writer and television producer Shonda Rhimes, who created “Grey’s Anatomy” and “Scandal,” is selling her Italian villa-style resort in Los Angeles for $ 25 million.

Located in the affluent enclave of Hancock Park, the resort, which includes a separate guesthouse and cabin, is his personal residence, said listing agent Ed Solórzano of Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices California Properties.

Located on two adjoining plots, the main house measures approximately 11,700 square feet and has seven bedrooms, nine bathrooms and three half baths, according to marketing materials. The gated property has a car park and a three-car garage, and the courtyard has a swimming pool, outdoor fireplace and walled garden with a fountain.

Originally built in 1923, the house was designed by architect Elmer Gray, who designed the Beverly Hills Hotel and the Pasadena Playhouse. Ms. Rhimes bought the home for $ 8.8 million in 2014, according to property records.

After purchasing the house, Ms Rhimes spent three to four years renovating it, Mr Solórzano said, taking everything in charge and working with interior designer Michael Smith, who designed the Oval Office and the Private quarters of the White House for former President Barack Obama. .


Source link

read more
Puerto rico government

Decisions can encourage hospital workers to talk about safety

Kare Jo Young wrote a letter to her local newspaper criticizing officials at the hospital where she worked as the activities coordinator, saying their actions resulted in staff shortages and other patient safety issues.

Hours after her letter was published in September 2017, officials at Maine Coast Memorial Hospital in Ellsworth, Maine fired her, citing a policy that no employee can give information to the media without direct participation from the media office.

But a federal appeals court recently said Young’s dismissal violated the law and ordered his reinstatement. The court ruling could mean hospitals and other employers will have to revise their policies prohibiting workers from speaking to media and posting on social media.

publicity

These media policies have been a bitter source of conflict in hospitals over the past year, as doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers across the country have been fired or sanctioned for speaking or posting in public. what they considered to be dangerously inadequate Covid-19 safety precautions. These fights also reflect a growing tension between healthcare workers, including doctors, and the increasingly large, for-profit companies that employ them.

On May 26, the 1st U.S. Court of Appeals unanimously upheld a National Labor Relations Board ruling last year that the hospital, now known as the Northern Light Maine Coast Hospital, violated federal labor law by firing Young for engaging in protected “concerted activity”. “The NLRB defines it as ensuring the right to act with co-workers to resolve work-related issues, such as issuing petitions for better hours or speaking out on safety issues. He also confirmed the finding. of the board that the hospital’s media policy prohibiting contact between employees and the media was illegal.

publicity

“This is great news because I know all hospitals prefer that we don’t talk with the media,” said Cokie Giles, president of the Maine State Nurses Association, a union. “We are careful what we say and how we say it because we don’t want to hurt ourselves. “

The 1st Circuit opinion is remarkable because it is one of the few such decisions on employee speech under national labor relations law ever made by a federal appeals court, and the first in nearly 20 years, said Frank LoMonte, a University of Florida law professor who heads the Brechner Center for Freedom of Information.

The decisions of the 1st Circuit and the NLRB should force hospitals to “pull out their manual and make sure it doesn’t prevent employees from speaking,” he said. “If you’re fired for breaking a ‘do not talk to media’ policy, you should be able to get your job back. “

The American Hospital Association and the Federation of American Hospitals declined to comment for this article.

While the 1st Circuit opinion is only binding in four northeastern states and Puerto Rico, the NLRB’s ruling is legally binding across the country. The case applies to both unionized and non-unionized employees, according to legal experts.

In March, the NLRB also ordered automaker Tesla to revise its policy prohibiting employees from speaking to the media without written permission.

Hospitals and healthcare organizations often have policies requiring employees to clear all public comments in the workplace with the organization’s media office. Many also have policies restricting what employees can say on Facebook and other social media.

Hospitals say requiring employees to go through their media offices prevents the release of inaccurate information that could damage public confidence. In Young’s case, the hospital argued that his letter contained false and derogatory statements. But the 1st Circuit panel agreed with the NLRB that his letter was “not abusive” and that his only false statement was not his fault.

Healthcare organizations have unchallenged legal authority to prohibit employees from disclosing confidential patient information or proprietary business information, according to legal experts.

But the 1st Circuit panel made it clear that an employer cannot prevent an employee from engaging in “concerted actions” – such as media awareness – “in favor of a group concern”. This is true even if the employee acted alone, as Young did when writing his letter. The key in her case was that she “acted in favor of what had already been established as a group concern,” the court said.

“I think employers with a blanket ban on speaking to the media need to review their policies,” said Eric Meyer, partner at FisherBroyles in Philadelphia, who often represents companies on labor law issues. “If you go to the media and say, ‘There are unsafe working conditions that impact me and my colleagues,’ that is a protected concerted activity. “

Chad Hansen, Young’s attorney in a separate federal lawsuit alleging disability discrimination against the hospital, said she has yet to be reinstated in her job. Young declined to comment.

The hospital’s parent company, Northern Light Health, has only said that its news media policy – which was changed after Young’s dismissal – meets NLRB and Circuit 1 requirements and will not be changed again. . The new policy created an exception allowing employees to speak to news media related to concerted activities protected by federal law.

The rights of expression under the national industrial relations law are particularly important for employees of private companies. Although the Constitution protects people who work for public hospitals and other government employers with its guarantee that governments cannot restrict speech, employees of private companies do not have the First Amendment right to speak publicly. workplace issues.

“I hope this case will keep the right of healthcare workers to talk about something dangerous alive,” said Ming Lin, an emergency room doctor who lost his job last year at PeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center. of Bellingham, Wash., after publicly criticizing the hospital’s preparedness for a pandemic.

Lin, who was employed by TeamHealth, which provides emergency physician services to the hospital, lost his PeaceHealth assignment in March 2020 shortly after he said on social media and in interviews with reporters that PeaceHealth was not taking urgent enough action to protect Covid staff members. He had worked at the hospital for 17 years.

In an April 2020 YouTube interview, PeaceHealth Director of Operations Richard DeCarlo said Lin was taken off the hospital’s emergency room schedule because he “continued to post false information, which made people afraid and afraid to come to the hospital “. DeCarlo also alleged that Lin, who was out of town for part of the time he was on duty, refused to communicate with his supervisors in Bellingham about the situation. PeaceHealth declined to comment for this article.

PeaceHealth’s social media policy at the time stated that the company did not prohibit employees from engaging in concerted federally protected activities and that they “are free to express their views.” TeamHealth’s Social Media Policy, dated July 15, 2020, states that the company reserves the right to take disciplinary action in response to behavior that adversely affects the company.

Lin, who now works for the Indian Health Service in South Dakota, sued PeaceHealth, TeamHealth and DeCarlo in a Washington state court, alleging unfair dismissal in violation of public order, breach of contract and defamation.

Jennifer Bryan, chairman of the board of directors of the Mississippi State Medical Association, who has publicly defended two Mississippi doctors fired for posting articles about the inadequacy of their hospitals’ Covid safety policies, said she was suffering from pressure from his hospital for speaking to the media without obtaining approval.

The medical association urged its members to speak to the media about the science of Covid, while employers insisted that doctors’ posts had to be approved by the media office. This reflected a conflict, she said, between medical professionals primarily concerned with public health and leaders of for-profit systems who sought to protect their brand image.

Bryan predicted that the court ruling and the NLRB ruling would be helpful. “Doctors need to be able to stand up and stand up for what they believe affects the safety and well-being of patients,” she said. “Otherwise, there are no checks and balances. “

Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism on health issues. It is a program of KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation), an endowed nonprofit organization that provides information on health issues.


Source link

read more
Legislature

Legislature corrects budget issues at close of special session

Hawaii lawmakers made several corrections to the state budget at the suggestion of Governor David Ige and overturned a final veto related to state bonds on Thursday, the last day of the brief special session of the Assembly. legislative.

Many of the details of these measures were already settled on Tuesday, when the legislature overturned five of Ige’s vetoes. However, House and Senate rules required lawmakers to wait until Thursday to proceed with final votes.

On Thursday, the Legislature issued a sixth waiver, this time from Bill 53, the legal mechanism that allows the state government to borrow more than $ 1 billion over the next two fiscal years to finance construction projects.

Like Thursday’s other approvals, the veto waiver was technical in nature. There was little discussion of the measures, and lawmakers concluded their work and adjourned the veto session in less than an hour on Thursday.

Lawmakers finished their work and adjourned the veto session on Thursday in less than an hour. Cory Lum / Civil Beat / 2021

The legislature inserted $ 496 million in debt service payable to the state treasury in Bill 54. The measure helps address one of Ige’s concerns that lawmakers violated federal guidelines when they used American Rescue Plan Act funds to pay for some of these capital improvements. projects.

The bill also deposits $ 250 million in the rainy day fund.

These fixes to HB 54 were needed before lawmakers could take a final vote on HB 53, Senate Speaker Ron Kouchi said.

The legislature followed up with sweeping money sitting in various pockets around the state government to deposit it in the general treasury. This ruling gives lawmakers greater control over how these funds are used.

Lawmakers also approved minor changes to Bill 1299 recommended by Ige to correct wording regarding the Milk Control Special Fund and the Hawaiian Home Lands Trust Fund.

The legislature also took some of Ige’s suggestions regarding Senate Bill 589, which deals with various facets of the University of Hawaii.

An important provision allows the president of the UH, David Lassner, to act as the person in charge of the purchases of the system. There are also other contractual terms that lawmakers have clarified at Ige’s request.

However, lawmakers have gone their own way when it comes to the UH Cancer Center. Lawmakers promulgated the cancer center and demanded that it be affiliated with the John A. Burns School of Medicine.

Ige objected to the provision, saying that enshrining the cancer center’s obligations in law limits the university’s ability to make changes in the future.

“These structural changes should be made in consultation with the leadership of the respective institutions and the leadership of UH Manoa,” Ige wrote in his objections to the bill.

read more
1 17 18 19 20 21 26
Page 19 of 26